Blog
The History of Tarot: From Italian Card Games to Modern Readings
The earliest surviving references to tarot date to the 1440s–1450s in northern Italy, where it developed as a card game whose suits use repeated emblems (The Metropolitan Museum of Art). Divinatory use developed in the late eighteenth century (Victoria and Albert Museum).
If you want a practical overview of how decks and readings work today, start with our guide to what tarot is or visit the learning hub.
Chronology of Tarot Decks and Reading Traditions
The table below traces key milestones from fifteenth-century Italian court play to twentieth-century esoteric traditions.
| Period or Milestone | Historical Development | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Circa 1450–1480 (Milan) | Production of the Visconti-Sforza luxury cards; 74 cards survive across the Morgan Library (35), Accademia Carrara (26), and Colleoni family (13), though they do not form a complete original deck and their artists remain disputed. | The Morgan Library & Museum |
| Marseille Tradition | Patterned European playing and reading lineage that carried suited and trump structures into wide print circulation without a single documented birth date. | Tarot de Marseille guide |
| 1781 | Antoine Court de Gébelin published his Egyptian-origin theory, which museum scholarship describes as misinformation. | The Morgan Library & Museum |
| 1783 | According to Arthur Edward Waite's historical account, Etteilla issued tracts claiming tarot was an ancient Egyptian Book of Thoth. | The Pictorial Key to the Tarot |
| 1888 & 1909 | Golden Dawn formed (1888); members Waite and Pamela Colman Smith published the Rider–Waite–Smith deck (1909). | Victoria and Albert Museum |
| Thoth Tradition | Designed by Aleister Crowley and painted by Lady Frieda Harris, expanding twentieth-century esoteric symbolism. | Thoth tarot deck guide |
Surviving Luxury Decks and Early European Play
People asking who invented tarot cards often expect the name of a single creator or workshop. However, surviving historical evidence does not identify an exact inventor or a sole city of origin. Alongside early textual records, surviving luxury sets include the Visconti, Visconti-Sforza, and Brambilla decks (The Metropolitan Museum of Art).
The famous Visconti-Sforza cards were painted in Milan rather than printed for mass use. Because the surviving cards are divided among three collections and do not represent a complete original pack, historians study them as courtly artifacts rather than a unified occult manual. Cheaper printed packs later spread across Europe, including the lineage covered in our guide to the Tarot de Marseille.
Why Imagery Does Not Prove Early Users Shared Modern Beliefs
Later occult interpretations must not be projected back onto medieval makers (The Metropolitan Museum of Art). A painted figure shows what an artist and patron recognized visually, not how a modern reader interprets a spread.
To see why visual motifs do not prove shared beliefs, consider a clearly hypothetical comparison from modern life. Imagine an archaeologist five hundred years from now uncovering a twenty-first-century strategy board game decorated with dragons, zodiac signs, and alchemical icons. If that future researcher claimed that modern families gathered on Friday nights to conduct mystical rituals, they would be confusing game art with spiritual doctrine. Players needed distinct pictures to track trump ranks during a trick-taking game, and artists drew from familiar cultural imagery of their own era.
How Tarot Shifted from Card Games to Divination
The shift from trick-taking game to cartomancy took shape in late eighteenth-century France through specific writers and practitioners rather than ancient tradition.
After Court de Gébelin promoted his Egyptian hypothesis in 1781, professional diviners reshaped how the public viewed the pack. Etteilla used playing cards in the 1770s, adopting tarot in the 1780s (Victoria and Albert Museum).
Writing in 1910, Arthur Edward Waite reviewed these early occult claims in The Pictorial Key to the Tarot (Wikisource). In Waite's account, Etteilla's 1783 tracts promoted the idea that the deck was an ancient Egyptian Book of Thoth, though Waite himself rejected the Egyptian-origin claim as unhistorical. Waite's critique is useful because it shows that even influential esoteric authors recognized a gap between eighteenth-century lore and documented card history.
In the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, ceremonial magic groups and illustrators redesigned the cards around symbolic systems. Expanding these twentieth-century frameworks, Aleister Crowley and Lady Frieda Harris developed the esoteric system explored in our Thoth tarot deck guide.
Evaluating Origin Myths and Religious Questions
When you read a deck guidebook or compare articles on tarot history, three distinctions help keep the record clear:
- Unproven origin myths vs. documented play: Claims that ancient Egyptian priests or wandering groups invented tarot as a secret code lack historical proof. They reflect eighteenth- and nineteenth-century storytelling rather than fifteenth-century Italian card making.
- Historical facts vs. personal faith questions: Studying how tarot evolved from a Renaissance game into a symbolic tool is different from deciding how the practice fits your personal beliefs. If you are weighing scriptural passages, church teaching, and personal conscience, read our guide on whether tarot cards are evil.
- Practical application today: In a hypothetical self-reflection session, you can use a traditional trump card to think through a career decision or daily habit on its own symbolic merits, without needing an ancient origin myth to make the exercise meaningful.
Sources
Tarot is for reflection and entertainment, not medical, legal, financial or psychological advice.